90% of the world had no clue Kelly Rowland had released a second solo album, so she's decided to release it with none of the original tracks. I think Kelly and her people are missing the whole idea of a re-release. Isn't the purpose of a re-release to re-introduce an album to an audience who missed / didn't care / ignored the album the first time around? Nobody is going to buy this Diva deluxe rubbish. Especially given that the original Ms. Kelly tracklisting is better than the new one.This is a bigger waste of time than I initially thought when I heard Kelly was re-releasing her album. It's almost embarassing. To re-release an album with a whack tracklisting, a budget looking cover that looks like it was shot in front of a fence at B&Q and to call it Diva deluxe when there ain't anothing diva like about the artist or deluxe about the package is a joke.
It's a real shame because I like Kelly Rowland and I thought Ms. Kelly was a solid album. But solo stardom obviously isn't destined for her. Her career highlights include knowing Beyoncé and fainting on stage at Lagos. Kelly best go down on her knees and pray Beyoncé decides to agree to a Destiny's child reunion. I cannot see Columbia funding a third flop for Kelly. In the meantime I suggest she applies to work at a McDonalds or moonlight at a Wal Mart.
i know what you mean, they just filled the whole album with stupid mixes.. i really hope she does well. she should just go and start on a new album and focuss on pop and dance traks
ReplyDeletelove the site
She should've just left it a few months and recorded an all new album and included 4 of Ms. Kelly's best tracks on it. Re-releasing an album that bombed so badly the first time around is a waste of time.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comment by the way! :D